The possibility of judgment aggregation on agendas with subjunctive implications
نویسنده
چکیده
The new eld of judgment aggregation aims to nd collective judgments on logically interconnected propositions. Recent impossibility results establish limitations on the possibility to vote independently on the propositions. I show that, fortunately, the impossibility results do not apply to a wide class of realistic agendas once propositions like if a then b are adequately modelled, namely as subjunctive implications rather than material implications. For these agendas, consistent and complete collective judgments can be reached through appropriate quota rules (which decide propositions using acceptance thresholds). I characterise the class of these quota rules. I also prove an abstract result that characterises consistent aggregation for arbitrary agendas in a general logic. Key words: judgment aggregation, subjunctive implication, material implication, characterisation of possibility agendas JEL Classi cation Numbers: D70, D71, D79
منابع مشابه
The possibility of judgment aggregation under subjunctive implications
The new eld of judgment aggregation aims to nd group judgments on logically interconnected propositions. Recent impossibility results have established limitations on the possibility to vote independently on the propositions, hence notably on the possibility to use quota rules (rules with acceptance thresholds for the propositions). I show that, fortunately, the impossibilities fail to apply t...
متن کاملAlgebraic Logic view on Judgment Aggregation ?
In the present paper, we propose Abstract Algebraic Logic (AAL) as a general logical framework for Judgment Aggregation. Our main contribution is a generalization of Herzberg’s algebraic approach to characterization results on judgment aggregation and propositionalattitude aggregation, characterizing certain Arrovian classes of aggregators as Boolean algebra and MV-algebra homomorphisms, respec...
متن کاملAn Abstract Algebraic Logic View on Judgment Aggregation
In the present paper, we propose Abstract Algebraic Logic (AAL) as a general logical framework for Judgment Aggregation. Our main contribution is a generalization of Herzberg’s algebraic approach to characterization results in on judgment aggregation and propositionalattitude aggregation, characterizing certain Arrovian classes of aggregators as Boolean algebra and MV-algebra homomorphisms, res...
متن کاملProbabilistic opinion pooling generalized. Part one: general agendas
How can di¤erent individualsprobability assignments to some events be aggregated into a collective probability assignment? Classic results on this problem assume that the set of relevant events the agenda is a -algebra and is thus closed under disjunction (union) and conjunction (intersection). We drop this demanding assumption and explore probabilistic opinion pooling on general agendas. On...
متن کاملMany-valued judgment aggregation: characterizing the possibility/impossibility boundary for an important class of agendas∗
A general model of judgment aggregation is presented in which judgments on propositions are not binary but come in degrees. The primitives of the model are a set of propositions, an entailment relation, and a “triangular norm” which establishes a lower bound on the degree to which a proposition is true whenever it is entailed by a set of propositions. For an important class of agendas, we ident...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- J. Economic Theory
دوره 145 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010